Supreme Court, Kings County Puts Some Flesh on “Serious Injury” Threshold Case Law

Kings County Supreme Court Justice Schack analyzes with precision in Uzilov v. Jimenez the evidentiary proof necessary for an insured to demonstrate that he or she has experienced a "serious injury" under Insurance Law section 5102(d).  This decision provides a nice complement to the New York  Court of Appeals‘ decision on the issue in Toure v. Avis  Rent A Car Sys., Inc.

Notably, Justice Schack rejected the report of one of the plaintiff’s doctors because he described an injury as "equivocal."

← Back to Home