Evidence & Experts
Evidence and expert strategy in New York litigation
This section covers evidentiary rules, expert disclosure, and admissibility, and the strategic use of proof in New York civil litigation. Posts address issues from discovery through trial and appeal.
What You’ll Find Here
- New York evidentiary standards and common trial pitfalls
- Expert disclosure, scope, and CPLR compliance issues
- Admissibility challenges to medical, engineering, and economic experts
- Motions to preclude, limit, or strike expert testimonyFoundations for documents, records, and demonstrative evidence
- Use and misuse of treating physicians as experts
- Cross-examination strategies for opposing experts
- Preservation of evidentiary issues for appeal
- Appellate decisions shaping evidence and expert practice
-

Impeachment Evidence in New York Cases: Proven Convictions vs. Collateral Attacks
Read more: Impeachment Evidence in New York Cases: Proven Convictions vs. Collateral Attacks -

Third Department Enforces CPLR § 3101 (d) Regarding Treating Physicians
Read more: Third Department Enforces CPLR § 3101 (d) Regarding Treating Physicians -

New York Spoliation of Surveillance Video: Second Department Rejects Preclusion
Read more: New York Spoliation of Surveillance Video: Second Department Rejects Preclusion -

Impeachment in New York Civil Law: Proven Convictions vs. Collateral Attacks
Read more: Impeachment in New York Civil Law: Proven Convictions vs. Collateral Attacks -

Rare Sanction: Court Strikes School District’s Answer for Spoliation of Athletic Field Evidence
Read more: Rare Sanction: Court Strikes School District’s Answer for Spoliation of Athletic Field Evidence