Representative Cases

ernie journeys r5wu0b6ouws unsplash

Coe v Village of Waterloo, 229 AD3d 2119 (4th Dept 2025) – Municipality Liability

Matt successfully defended municipal and contractor defendants in a New York property damage action alleging trespass, nuisance, and injunctive relief based on the alleged artificial diversion of stormwater onto the plaintiff’s properties. The claims arose from a courthouse renovation project that connected a new stormwater system to a historic underground culvert. The courts held that the claims were time-barred.

Read more
zoshua colah am1fyaai7ws unsplash

Applewhite v 112 Liberty Associates LLC (Supreme Court, Kings County 2025) – Release Agreements

Matt secured summary judgment for a building owner and contractor in a high-exposure New York construction-site personal-injury action, resulting in dismissal of the complaint in its entirety. The case presented significant liability and damages exposure typical of major construction accident claims. The Supreme Court adopted Matt’s arguments that a general release executed by the plaintiff prior to commencing the action barred the claims.

Read more
jacques le gall 4ccugnocaqm unsplash

Chiappa v The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Supreme Court, Bronx County 2025) – Labor Law

Matt secured summary judgment for multiple defendants in a high-exposure construction-site personal injury action arising from renovation and construction work at New York’s LaGuardia Airport, one of the state’s most complex and highly regulated construction environments. The plaintiff alleged that a defective ramp within one of the airport terminals forced him to manually lift an approximately 400-pound plate.

Read more
glenov brankovic t9eqm2y1tn8 unsplash

Jimenez v 40 East 66th LLC, et al. (Supreme Court, Kings County) – Labor Law/Indemnification

Matt represented a steel contractor in a New York construction accident lawsuit arising from renovation work at a multi-unit apartment building. The general contractor commenced a third-party action seeking contractual indemnification and defense under indemnification and hold harmless provisions in the construction contract. The court adopted Matt’s arguments and held that the contractual indemnification provisions did not apply.

Read more
pairach boriboonmee npn89lmzwb8 unsplash

Salisbury v Christian, 68 AD3d 1664 (4th Dept 2009) – Insurance Defense

In this motor-vehicle personal injury action, Matt secured a significant appellate win for his clients when the Appellate Division unanimously reversed the trial court’s decision granting the plaintiffs a directed verdict on causation. The case involved a rear-end motorcycle collision where liability against Matt’s clients was purely vicarious, making the credibility and causation issues especially critical.

Read more